🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where Black people are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to scrub African American heritage and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.