🔗 Share this article

Labour deals with an image problem. In a recent survey, people expressed the perspective that the party is “dishonest”, “only interested in themselves”, and “the same as the rest”. It’s no wonder, they find themselves concerningly 10 points behind opposition party Reform.

The notion of “coiffure assurance” was created by writer Simon Doonan. Writing in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election that would see Donald Trump first take office, he clarified: “Leadership hair equals assured styling”. This concept defines hair that is what it appears to be. Lacking pretense. No Greco-Roman fakery.

At that time, Doonan dismissed Trump’s “iconic coiffure”, noting: “It’s Liberace’s candelabra. It mimics Mick Jagger’s mouth. But is it presidential? I suspect not.”

Currently discussing, he explains: I classified him in the category of ‘unlikely to win’, because his hair is somewhat mysterious; unnecessarily intricate and requiring salon maintenance.”

The Contrast Among Political Styles

Recently afforded the excellent chance to observe the difference. While Trump and Starmer presented their newly executed digital partnership at a combined briefing during Trump’s official trip to the UK, they further offered a chance to see, together, their distinctive hairstyles.

The subtle golden layers transitioned, typically, to a Mr Whippy swirl, in turn descending into a duck’s arse flip. Starmer’s, by contrast, was stiffly set up into its usual stiff, pastry-inspired peak.

The Importance of Political Hair

Hair matters, per Rachael Gibson, who goes by The Hair Historian: “Few body parts which convey information about us. styling indicates including your position, your place in society, your faith.”

None of which is novel. “Since day one, people have engaged in unusual practices to their hair for the sake of seeking alternative perception, or to pass a message about themselves.”

Far from it being a absurdity to think about executive coiffure, it is yet another perspective through which we can scrutinise officials and the current political climate.

Establishing Credibility By Means of Image

“This constitutes an additional method of nonverbal communication,” explains Washington DC-based presentation advisor and fashion expert Lauren A Rothman. Reliability counts. “The language that I employ with my clients is ‘clothing, hair, makeup; your presentation that appears purposeful, even if messy, builds confidence.”

Although Doonan stresses that styling assurance doesn’t guarantee success, he believes it can support. He uses Kamala Harris’s cut, which was read by some as a symbol of African-American styling freedom, as an illustration.

Contemporary Patterns in Executive Styling

Presently it appears like a stylist’s collection of Republicans have coiffure assurance in abundance. Examine the coiffure of recently appointed military leader Pete Hegseth.

Although not a great distance from Starmer’s, it is different in aspects that make it considerably more definite: it is particularly firm, extra pomaded; extra.

For men in power specifically, having a healthy head of hair, according to Gibson, “implies that you maintain good health, you’re virile, you’re powerful, you’re healthy. each aspect that we expect from a chief.”

The Intersection of Hair and Leadership

Much of the styling confidence phenomenon is a indication of the glossy Maga aesthetic. “An entertainment element exists that usually doesn’t appear in government,” observes Doonan, although US governmental sphere is generally more polished than the UK’s.

It also fits with the prevailing political climate of the period. As political science expert Tim Bale clarified: “Each official have a image, but if you’re a popular leader, it needs to be oversized, and dramatic styling is component of that image.

The Subtle Distinction in Leadership Presentation

Prevails a fine line between proper presentation and looking as if you’re spending considerable effort in the barber, and inadequate attention in the Senate or the House.

Especially regarding female leaders, and notably in the United Kingdom, where we considered suitable to reward Boris Johnson, a figure who looked a unacquainted with styling, with the top job.

English officials, notes Doonan, “have to be restrained. You can’t seem like you’re spending all day worrying about your presentation.”

Although Doonan would maintain that styling confidence is largely “American occurrence”, he considers that’s changing: “The media and digital platforms has pushed all of us into this world where each element is concerning coiffure, basically.”

Luckily, regardless of opinion about the Labour leader’s style, Nigel Farage’s hair is distinctly lacking also.